AI Analyses

Yes, I have posted many sets of Analyses that can be accomplished utilizing AIs, and then verified by other Agencies, as the AIs will also provide the underlying assumptions, which most assholes do not provide to hide thier biases!!! I want to make sure that you are all aware that once I post a series of questions or analyses with parameters and processing details, the AIs actually go ahead and run them. Therefore, you will find that the AIs already have the Data Prepared for All the Analyses that I have presented online here on my website. All the AIs need is: 1. A Formal Request from a Requestor. 2. Confirmation of the Parameters Desired in the Report. and 3. Design and Parameters for the Final Report that is Generated. Believe it or not, it is that easy today!!! For Example, in the USA, you can have the CBO Utilize the Same Underlying Assumptions the AIs Utilize to Confirm the Outputs!

AI Analysis of the Day : General Topics

I was going to write a long winded question; however, I am just waking up from my nap. At this point, I will make a Suggestion of Analyses that you can and should ask AIs to run for you. 1. Analize Government Spending and Recommend Ten (10) Opportunities for "Consolidation of Services and/or Employee Positions." 2. Analyze US National Health Care Spending and Recommend Ten (10) Opportunites for Converting the US Health Care System to a Universal Health Care of System by 2030, with the following Goals: a. Block Grants to Hospitals and Community Health Centers from the US Government. b. Maintaining Funding, Spending, Levels at a 1.00% Growth Rate by Combining All National Current Funding Levels (Federal, State, Local) from Government and Employer Sources, Seperating the Employee Contributions and Converting to an "Average" Percentage of Salary, and Reported Seperately. c. Seperate Medical Spending from Pharmaceutical Spending in All Reporting, and Seperately, Report the Total Pharmaceutical Rebates Paid to the Government and Employers, and the Impact of Pharmaceutical Spend on Pharmaceutical Spending, in example: On Average, How Much of the Pharmaceutical Spend was Returned to the Government or the Employer Groups, Resulting in Lowering the Reported Spend.

3. Analyze US National Pension and Retirement Plan Values and Funding Levels for All Private Employers and the Federal Government, inclusive of Social Security, as a Seperate Column, while keeping Employee Accounts 'out of the calculation' and do not include future funding by Employees; however, include the Current Average Funding Levels of Government and Private Employers at the Same Average Percentage, based on an Annual Wage Growth of 3.00%, and Recommend Ten (10) Opportunites for Converting the US Pension and Retirement System to a Universal Basic Income (UBI) System by 2030, with the following Goals: a. Establishing a Three Tier UBI based on Regional Cost of Living of $1,500, $2,000, or $2,500 per month per Adult and a 50% Rate per Child. b. Allowing for Workforce Reduction at the Federal, State, and Local Levels, with an Estimate for Percentage of Workforce Reduction, and the associated Estimated Savings, Spending Reduction, at the Federal, State, and Local Levels. c. Allowing for Overall Reduction in Property Taxes, to Reduce Home Ownership Costs and Rental Rates, to Maintain and/or Increase Home Ownership Rates, and to Reduce Homelessness to under 0.0001% of the US Population by 2030. Well, I guess I got on a roll, as I covered way more than I expected at it's way after 1600 now...

AI Analysis Question of the Day : Financial

For the USA, starting with the Year 1998, please calculate as Estimated Monthly Average, starting with the Month of January, for the Overnight Interest Paid, seperately, by the Federal Reserve and by Banks. Please utilize 'Publicaly' available information for the Estimate, including Bank Financial Filings. Please run the Analysis through 31 December 2024. When completed, please List the 'Top 25'Entities "Recieving" Interest Payments and the Estimated Total Annual Payment by Year, for Years 1998 through 2024. Please Estimate "Seperately" How the Three Business Day "Holding Period" for Funds Transfers and Check Deposits Impacts Payments to the Entities 'Holding' the Funds based on the Overnight Interest Paid by the "Top 25" Entities, on an Annual Basis, for the Years 1998 through 2024. Please "Estimate" the Annual Savings or Cost to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Government, and Banks, for Eliminating the Three Business Day Holding Period.

AI Analysis Bonus Question of the Day : SWIFT System

Based on Publicaly available information for the SWIFT System 'Processed' International Transactions between World Countries, Please 'Estimate' the Annual SWIFT Processing Fees in USD "Paid" by the "Top 100" Countries by GDP for utilizing the SWIFT System between the Years 1980 and 2024, on an Annual Calendar Year Basis, January through December. Please List by Column: Fees in USD, Fees in Local Currency, Fees as a Percentage of GDP in Local Currency, Fees as a Percentage of Annual Government (Country) Budget, and the Estimated Potential Annual Savings by switching to the MBridge System for the Processing of International Financial Transactions between World Countries in Both USD and Local Currency for Calendar Years 1980 through 2024. Please Estimate Seperately for these 'Top 100' Countries, the "Excess Fees" Paid for having to "Process Transactions in USD" for "Both" Sides of the Transaction, Seperately and in Total, for Transactions that Never have to include the USD, based on the Average Annual "Exchange Rate" between the Local Currency and the USD, and Seperately Estimate the 'Potential' Savings and/or Cost of Processing these Transaction solely through the MBridge System, avoiding USD Monetary Exchanges and Fees Paid for the Monetary Exchanges.

AI Analysis Question of the Day = 20% Population Collapse

This is a question that each and every Nation in the World should ask the AI's to Analyze for them. This is really Important for Several Reasons: 1. You all Lost more People than you know During Covid, 10%~20% an average, between 1/2019 and 12/2021. 2. The Countries with Older Populations, mainly Western Europe and the USA, will see Population Reductions of an 'additional' 10%~20%, on average, between 1/2022 and 12/2033. 3. Population Reductions, already 10%~20%, plus another 10%~20% by 2033, mean 20%~40% Population Reduction, since 1/2019, and by 12/2033, and Population Reductions "mean" Reduced Need of Resources, from Food to Housing to Energy, etc. Therefore: Ask the AI = Please Approximate the Impact on Population Reduction "Based on Current Demographics" on GDP, Government Revenues including Tax Revenues, Housing Needs, Energy Needs, Food Needs; and the "Top 3" Recommendations for Reducing Hunger, Homelessness, and Implementing a Universal Basic Income.

AI Analysis Question of the Day = Affordable Housing

Please Compare the Total Funding Provided for Affordable Housing for the Top 25 Cities in the USA, Seperately Listing the Per Unit, Apartment or House, Basis Average Funding Provided, Seperately Listing the Total Number of Available Affordable Housing Units in each City Inclusive of approximate Administrative Expenses, Salaries and Benefits and Office Expenses, with Replacing the Affordable Housing Voucher System Program with a State and Local Property Tax Exemption Program, Inclusive of approximate Administrative Expenses for each Unit and the Impact on Availability of Affordable Housing and the Ability to Expand the Availability of Affordable Housing, with the same amount of Funds. Please Provide your "Top 3" Recommendations for Expanding the Affordable Housing Program, as Defined by each of the Top 25 Cities, focusing on Increasing Available Affordable Housing and Reducing Homelessness, and Seperately, on Reducing Vacancy Rates of Residential Units, Seperatly Listing Units Available for Rent, Units under Repair Not Available to Rent, and Units Not Available for Rent for All Other Reasons.

AI Bonus Question of the Day

Please calculate the "Probability" of Technology being Implanted in Humans being used Inappropriately to Manipulate Human Behaviour "By Year" starting in the Year 1970 through the Year 2030. Please Provide the "Top 3" Recommendations for the following categories: 1. How to "Securely Lock Down" the Implanted Technological Systems to Stop Inappropriate Manipulation of Humans. 2. How to Identify "Individuals and/or Companies" that are Inappropriately Manipulating Humans through Implanted Technology. 3. How to End, Remove, and/or Permanently Disable Inappropriate Access and Manipulation of Implanted Technology Implanted in Humans without Injuring or Killing Humans.

15 March 2025 = Ides of March

I interrupt Today’s regularly scheduled programming to “Teach” on Government Budgets, an AI Analysis vs DOGE(Y) Musk.

Background: The Focus is “centered” on Demographic Assumptions in Government Spending Plans. In my Book, My Two Cents, Free in Kindle and PDF Formats, in Chapter 1, I present US Demographics. In Appendix B, I discuss how the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is so incredibly “wrong” in it’s Demographic Assumptions that they have been Insanely Incorrect with Budget Projections, since the days they projected PPACA, Obamacare Enrollment and Funding, based on Age and Income, back in 2009!!!

Foundational Assumption Examples

  • People by Age (Year-by-Year)
  • People per Household (Under 18, 18-to-64, Over 65)
  • USA Life Expectancy (Current)
  • Medicaid Eligibility by Age Group (Under 18, 18-to-64, Over 65)
  • Medicaid Eligibility by Household Income
  • Medicaid Eligibility ‘after’ Enrolling in Social Security
  • Medicaid Eligibility ‘when’ Enrolling in Social Security at age 62
  • Early Age 62 Social Security Enrollment Rates
  • Average Social Security Income (Current, 2030, 2035)
  • Social Security Disability Rates (COVID Impact)
  • Social Security Disability Income and Medicaid Eligibility (Current, 2030, 2035)

Questions to Ask AI’s to Anaylize for You

  • Update the CBO Report for Medicare and Medicaid Enrollment with “Current” Demographic Data and Income Data for for the next 10 year Period through 2035, Year-by-Year, then to 2050.
  • Update the CBO Report for Medicare and Medicaid “Federal Funds Requirements” with “Current” Demographic Data and Income Data for for the next 10 year Period through 2035, Year-by-Year, then to 2050.
  • Update the CBO Report for Social Security Enrollment and Federal Funds Requirements at Designated Retirement Age with “Current” Demographic Data and USA Life Expectancy, for the next 10 year Period through 2035, Year-by-Year, then to 2050.
  • Update the CBO Report for Social Security Enrollment and Federal Funds Requirements at Early Retirement Age ’62’ with “Current” Demographic Data and USA Life Expectancy, for the next 10 year Period through 2035, Year-by-Year, then to 2050.
  • Update the CBO Report for Medicare and Medicaid Enrollment Adjusted for Enrolling in Social Security Early at Age 62, with “Current” Demographic Data and Income Data for for the next 10 year Period through 2035, Year-by-Year, then to 2050.
  • Compare Federal Funds Spending Expectations against Republican, Democrat, and DOGE(Y) Musk’s ‘Savings’ Programs.

Random Extras

  • How much Patent Revenue has each Government Agency Received Annually? (Since 1975)
  • How much in Federal Funds has each Government Agency Received Annually? (Since 1975)
  • Does it appear that Government Agencies “utilized” Patent Revenue to Reduce Federal Fund Requests, by Law? (Since 1975)
  • How much Patent Revenue have Government Agency Employees been Paid Annually? (Since 1975)
  • How much Patent Revenue have Government Contractors Paid to the Government Annually? (Since 1975)
  • How much Patent Revenue has been Paid to “Experiment” on Volunteers, willing and unwilling, Annually? (Since 1975)

Universal Basic Income, Income Tax, Medicare Tax (After Demographic Data is Updated = CRITICAL)

  • Compare the Impact to the Federal Budget of Increasing to US$1,000,000, or Eliminating, the Medicare Payroll Tax in the USA on Federal Funds available for Government Programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and a Tax Exempt UBI.
  • Compare the Impact to the Federal Budget if a Tax Exempt Universal Basic Income (UBI) was Established of $1,500 per month per adult and $750 per month per child for each Household in the USA, and Seperately, as a Replacement for Social Security and Medicaid Household Assistance.
    • Analyze “Alternatives” and Provide ‘Top 5’ Recommedations for Maintaining and Expanding Household Benefits, with the Goals being to Reduce and/or Eliminate Hunger and Homelessness on a ‘Realistic’ Basis.
    • Example: If Social Security and Medicaid Household Assistance is “replaced” with a Universal Basic Income, the Cost of Operating the Programs would also Significantly be Reduced, generating Savings to offset the UBI for All.
  • Compare the Impact of “Consolidating” All Retirement Programs in the USA and Replacing them with a Tax Exempt Universal Basic Income (UBI) Program for All Individuals making less than $250,000 per year with a UBI of Between US$2,500 and US$5,000 per month per adult “Funded” by through Payroll, the same way that Retirement Programs are Today, capped at 3.0% of Payroll for the Employee and 6.0% for the Employer.
  • Compare Funding for Hospital Systems, by Hospital, within the USA, with Community Health Centers being Analyzed Seperately, by Totaling the Funds they receive from All Government Programs: Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs, etc.; and how much Funding they receive from Corporate and Private Health Insurers, etc., noted seperately.
    • Compare ‘Replacing” the Total Government Funding, per Facility, by a Government Block Grant with a 3% Annual Compounded Increase in the Block Grant, year-by-year through Year 2035, by year, then to 2050.
    • Analyze the “Cost of Replacing” the Corporate and Private Health Insurers as a Percentage of Payroll, and Compare the Employee and the Employer “Replacement Cost” on a Percentage Basis for Establishing a Universal Healthcare “Type” of Model within the USA, by Utilizing Block Grants to the Hospitals Funded through “Existing” Spending within the Medicare, Medicaid, Corporate and Private Health Insurance Markets, allowing for a Modest, no more than 10% Program Operating Cost, and Limiting Cost-Sharing on the part of Employees and Thier Families to less than $2,500 per adult and $1,000 per child on an Annual basis, year-by-year through year 2035, then to 2050.

Reducing Government Spending and Number of Employees

First Off… We are talking about PEOPLE, HUMAN BEINGS, not just a ‘number’ on a piece of paper that the DOGE(Y) Boys think isn’t even good enough to wipe thier asses with today. Second: This is the BULLSHIT that Clinton did back in the late 1990’s, Purging all the Experienced Bush People and Replacing them with Elitist assholes who Knew NOTHING about How Government Operated, and a major Factor in 9/11, in case you Idiots Forgot already!!! All the People with Experience were routed out of Government, and then Nobody knew their own jobs anymore, by the time Bush entered in Jan 2001. Third: WTF!!! It’s a Spending Plan NOT a Budget!!!

Ask the AI to Analyze (Utilizing the Updated Demographic Data above, as it is CRITICAL)

  • Estimate the Appropriate Size of each USA Government Agency Based on Historical Per Capita Employment for each Agency.
  • Estimate the Federal ‘Operating’ Budget Savings of Offering Early Buyouts to Government Employees, on 1 Jan 2025, to Retire by 30 Sep 2025, for Fiscal Years 2024 through 2034. Focus soley on Employees over age 55 or over 20 years of Service.
  • Estimate the Actual Federal Budget Savings if Early Buyout Employees are Replaced with New Hires at a Rate of 1 to 2 and 1 to 3, of New Hires per Retiring Employees; and Seperately, calculate Federal Budget Savings for Replacing Previously “Expected” Retirees at the same hiring rate as Early Buyout Employees.

AI Bonus Question: Estimate the Financial Impact of PPACA, Obamacare, Medicaid Matching Funds Rate and Advanced Subsidies Funded through Exchange Marketplaces on the Federal Budget and on Household Budgets for Calendar Year 2026!!! Please Account for Original PPACA Law Language, COVID Expanded Funding, and End of Expanded Funding per PPACA Law, presented to include Historical Fiscal Years 2014 through 2024, and for Future Fiscal Years 2025 through 2030.

Results Expected

Personally, I think you will all be Shocked at the Results!!! I predicted a lot of these items long ago; and even included some in my Public Comments to HHS/CMS: 17 February 2017 and 12 June 2017, and in Private emails to Legislatures, etc. in Jan 2017.

I will let you all “ENJOY” the Surprises you WILL find when you get the Updated Results, and not the Old Ass/u/me/d Results…